Clinical, genetic, and instrumental features of congenital myasthenic syndrome type 11

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) type 11, caused by pathogenic biallelic variants in the RAPSN gene, is one of the most common forms of CMS in patients of European origin. The disease is characterized by significant clinical heterogeneity, which, combined with the variability of electrophysiological findings, leads to diagnostic challenges. Accurate diagnosis determines the management strategy, enabling symptomatic treatment and improvement of functional outcomes.

Aim. To characterize the phenotypic spectrum of CMS type 11 and evaluate genotype–phenotype features based on clinical and instrumental examination of a cohort of patients with biallelic variants in the RAPSN gene.

Materials and methods. The study included 6 patients (4 female) from 5 families with a verified diagnosis of CMS type 11. All patients underwent molecular genetic testing: whole exome sequencing in all cases; in one case, whole genome sequencing using a targeted gene panel for myopathies and myasthenic syndromes was additionally performed, followed by Sanger sequencing validation of identified variants. Variant pathogenicity was assessed according to ACMG/APM (2015) criteria. All patients underwent clinical and genealogical analysis and laboratory testing (creatine phosphokinase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, myoglobin). Electrodiagnostic evaluation in 5 patients included neuromuscular transmission testing at 3 Hz repetitive nerve stimulation and needle electromyography of skeletal muscles; in two cases the protocol was extended – one patient underwent stimulation at 10 Hz and another at 50 Hz. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 3 patients.

Results. Molecular genetic analysis identified the recurrent variant in RAPSN (NM_005055.5): c.264C>A, p.(Asn88Lys) in all patients: in homozygous state in 4 patients, and in compound heterozygous state in 2 patients – in combination with c.61C>T, p.(Gln21Ter) and c.149_153delins24, p.(Val50GlufrTer114). In patients with the homozygous c.264C>A variant, the disease manifested in childhood or adolescence and followed a relatively mild course, presenting with blepharoptosis, oculomotor disturbances, and predominantly limb-girdle distribution of pathological muscle fatigability and weakness, without bulbar or respiratory involvement. In patients with compound heterozygous variants, the disease manifested in the neonatal period with respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, diffuse muscular hypotonia, and bulbar dysfunction, and was accompanied by delayed motor development, recurrent episodes of respiratory failure, and early orthopedic complications. Repetitive nerve stimulation at 3 Hz revealed a decremental response exceeding 30 % in 1 of 5 examined patients; preconditioning with physical exercise allowed verification of a decrement of 10–16 % in 2 additional patients. Needle electromyography in all 5 patients demonstrated a myopathic pattern of motor unit potential remodeling. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging in 3 patients revealed minimal fatty infiltration predominantly in the posterior muscle groups of the thighs and legs, combined with diffuse edematous changes in the posterior leg muscles. All patients with the homozygous recurrent variant and one patient with compound heterozygous variants received pyridostigmine bromide therapy with a positive clinical response.

Conclusion. CMS type 11 is characterized by a wide phenotypic spectrum – from a mild limb-girdle phenotype with extraocular involvement and childhood onset to severe forms with neonatal manifestation and respiratory failure. Disease severity is determined by the zygosity of the c.264C>A variant: in homozygous state it is associated with a mild late-onset phenotype, whereas in compound heterozygous combination with another pathogenic allele it is associated with neonatal manifestation and severe course. A myopathic pattern of motor unit potential remodeling on needle electromyography, combined with absent decrement on 3 Hz repetitive stimulation and minimal muscle magnetic resonance imaging changes, should not exclude CMS from the differential diagnosis with congenital myopathies. Timely molecular genetic verification of CMS determines the feasibility of symptomatic treatment and is of critical importance for prognosis and patient management.

About the authors

Evgeniya A. Melnik

Research Centre for Medical Genetics

Author for correspondence.
Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5436-836X
Russian Federation, 1 Moskvorechye St., Moscow 115522

S. N. Bardakov

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3804-6245
Russian Federation, 6 Akademika Lebedeva St., Saint Petersburg 194044

S. S. Nikitin

Research Centre for Medical Genetics

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3292-2758
Russian Federation, 1 Moskvorechye St., Moscow 115522

P. A. Chausova

Research Centre for Medical Genetics

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0431-1477
Russian Federation, 1 Moskvorechye St., Moscow 115522

Z. R. Umakhanova

Dagestan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7084-0572
Russian Federation, 1 Ploshchad Lenina, Makhachkala 367005, Republic of Dagestan

K. Y. Mollaeva

Dagestan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3812-0126
Russian Federation, 1 Ploshchad Lenina, Makhachkala 367005, Republic of Dagestan

L. M. Abdullaeva

National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1574-2050
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 2 Lomonosovskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119991

A. F. Murtazina

Research Centre for Medical Genetics

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7023-7378
Russian Federation, 1 Moskvorechye St., Moscow 115522

I. V. Sharkova

Research Centre for Medical Genetics

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5819-4835
Russian Federation, 1 Moskvorechye St., Moscow 115522

D. A. Saushev

Research Centre for Medical Genetics

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4936-3481
Russian Federation, 1 Moskvorechye St., Moscow 115522

D. O. Tashtanbaeva

Research Centre for Medical Genetics

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-1406-0703
Russian Federation, 1 Moskvorechye St., Moscow 115522

E. L. Dadali

Research Centre for Medical Genetics

Email: evmel88@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5602-2805
Russian Federation, 1 Moskvorechye St., Moscow 115522

References

  1. Engel A.G. Congenital myasthenic syndromes in 2018. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2018;18(8):46. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0852-4
  2. Ohno K., Ohkawara B., Shen X.M. et al. Clinical and pathologic features of congenital myasthenic syndromes caused by 35 genes – a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(4):3730. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043730
  3. Ohno K., Ito M., Ohkawara B. Review of 40 genes causing congenital myasthenic syndromes. J Hum Genet 2025. doi: 10.1038/s10038-025-01355-9
  4. Natera-de Benito D., Töpf A., Vilchez J.J. et al. Molecular characterization of congenital myasthenic syndromes in Spain. Neuromuscul Disord 2017;27(12):1087–98. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.08.003
  5. Troha Gergeli A., Neubauer D., Golli T. et al. Prevalence and genetic subtypes of congenital myasthenic syndromes in the pediatric population of Slovenia. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2020;26:34–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.02.002
  6. Krenn M., Sener M., Rath J. et al. The clinical and molecular landscape of congenital myasthenic syndromes in Austria: a nationwide study. J Neurol 2023;270(2):909–16. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11440-0
  7. Abicht A., Dusl M., Gallenmüller C. et al. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: achievements and limitations of phenotype-guided gene-after-gene sequencing in diagnostic practice: a study of 680 patients. Hum Mutat 2012;33(10):1474–84. doi: 10.1002/humu.22130
  8. Liao X., Wang Y., Lai X., Wang S. The role of Rapsyn in neuromuscular junction and congenital myasthenic syndrome. Biomol Biomed 2023;23(5):772–84. doi: 10.17305/bb.2022.8641
  9. Xing G., Xiong W.C., Mei L. Rapsyn as a signaling and scaffolding molecule in neuromuscular junction formation and maintenance. Neurosci Lett 2020;731:135013. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135013
  10. Ohno K., Engel A.G., Shen X.M. et al. Rapsyn mutations in humans cause endplate acetylcholine-receptor deficiency and myasthenic syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70(4):875–85.
  11. Müller J.S., Mildner G., Müller-Felber W. et al. Rapsyn N88K is a frequent cause of congenital myasthenic syndromes in European patients. Neurology 2003;60(11):1805–10. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000072262.14931.80
  12. Richard P., Gaudon K., Andreux F. et al. Possible founder effect of rapsyn N88K mutation and identification of novel rapsyn mutations in congenital myasthenic syndromes. J Med Genet 2003;40(6):e81. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.6.e81
  13. Dunne V., Maselli R.A. Common founder effect of rapsyn N88K studied using intragenic markers. J Hum Genet 2004;49(7):366–9. doi: 10.1007/s10038-004-0159-y
  14. Natera-de Benito D., Bestué M., Vilchez J.J. et al. Long-term follow-up in patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome due to RAPSN mutations. Neuromuscul Disord 2016;26(2):153–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2015.10.013
  15. Milone M., Shen X.M., Selcen D. et al. Myasthenic syndrome due to defects in Rapsyn: clinical and molecular findings in 39 patients. Neurology 2009;73(3):228–35. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ae7cbc
  16. Burke G., Cossins J., Maxwell S. et al. Rapsyn mutations in hereditary myasthenia: distinct early- and late-onset phenotypes. Neurology 2003;61(6):826–8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000085865.55513.ae
  17. Estephan E.P., Zambon A.A., Thompson R. et al. Congenital myasthenic syndrome: correlation between clinical features and molecular diagnosis. Eur J Neurol 2022;29(3):833–42. doi: 10.1111/ene.15173
  18. Engel A.G., Shen X.M., Selcen D., Sine S.M. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2015;14(4):420–34. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70201-7
  19. Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17(5):405–24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30
  20. Müller J.S., Mihaylova V., Abicht A., Lochmüller H. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: spotlight on genetic defects of neuromuscular transmission. Expert Rev Mol Med 2007; 9(22):1–20. doi: 10.1017/S1462399407000427
  21. Супонева Н.А., Арестова А.С., Мельник Е.А. и др. Валидация шкалы суммарной оценки мышечной силы (MRC sum score) для использования у русскоязычных пациентов с хронической воспалительной демиелинизирующей полинейропатией. Нервно-мышечные болезни 2023;13(1):68–74. doi: 10.17650/2222-8721-2023-13-1-68-74 Suponeva N.A., Arestova A.S., Melnik E.A. et al. Validation of the Medical Research Council sum score (MRCss) for use in Russian-speaking patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Nervno-myshechnye bolezni = Neuromuscular Diseases 2023;13(1):68–74. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/2222-8721-2023-13-1-68-74
  22. Ioos C., Barois A., Richard P. et al. Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to rapsyn deficiency: three cases with arthrogryposis and bulbar symptoms. Neuropediatrics 2004;35(4):246–9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820993
  23. Leshinsky-Silver E., Shapira D., Yosovitz K. et al. A novel mutation in the TPR6 domain of the RAPSN gene associated with congenital myasthenic syndrome. J Neurol Sci 2012;316(1–2):112–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.01.012
  24. Cossins J., Burke G., Maxwell S. et al. Diverse molecular mechanisms involved in AChR deficiency due to rapsyn mutations. Brain 2006;129(Pt 10):2773–83. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl219
  25. Maselli R.A., Dunne V., Pascual-Pascual S.I. et al. Rapsyn mutations in myasthenic syndrome due to impaired receptor clustering. Muscle Nerve 2003;28(3):293–301. doi: 10.1002/mus.10433
  26. Maselli R.A. Electrodiagnostic Evaluation of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes. Muscle Nerve 2026;73(5):731–45. doi: 10.1002/mus.70085
  27. Stojkovic T., Masingue M., Turmel H. et al. Diagnostic yield of a practical electrodiagnostic protocol discriminating between different congenital myasthenic syndromes. Neuromuscul Disord 2022;32(11–12):870–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2022.10.001
  28. Banwell B.L., Ohno K., Sieb J.P., Engel A.G. Novel truncating RAPSN mutations causing congenital myasthenic syndrome responsive to 3,4-diaminopyridine. Neuromuscul Disord 2004;14(3):202–7. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2003.11.004
  29. LoRusso S.J., Iyadurai S.J. Decrement with high frequency repetitive nerve stimulation in a RAPSN congenital myasthenic syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2018;57(3):E106–8. doi: 10.1002/mus.25995
  30. Visser A.C., Laughlin R.S., Litchy W.J. et al. Rapsyn congenital myasthenic syndrome worsened by fluoxetine. Muscle Nerve 2017;55(1):131–5. doi: 10.1002/mus.25244
  31. Saito M., Ogasawara M., Inaba Y. et al. Successful treatment of congenital myasthenic syndrome caused by a novel compound heterozygous variant in RAPSN. Brain Dev 2022;44(1):50–5. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2021.09.001
  32. Kinali M., Beeson D., Pitt M.C. et al. Congenital myasthenic syndromes in childhood: diagnostic and management challenges. J Neuroimmunol 2008;201–202:6–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.06.026
  33. Finlayson S., Morrow J.M., Rodriguez Cruz P.M. et al. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging in congenital myasthenic syndromes. Muscle Nerve 2016;54(2):211–9. doi: 10.1002/mus.25035

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Melnik E.A., Bardakov S.N., Nikitin S.S., Chausova P.A., Umakhanova Z.R., Mollaeva K.Y., Abdullaeva L.M., Murtazina A.F., Sharkova I.V., Saushev D.A., Tashtanbaeva D.O., Dadali E.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-44264 от  25.08.2023.