Differences of interference myogram patterns from forearm muscles at different variants of the hand grip

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Most modern bioprostheses use two sensors located on the flexor and extensor muscles of the hand and fingers to register muscle activity, which severely limits the functionality of the device and complicates switching between grips. One of the solutions to this problem is to use an array of more sensors to recognize different grips using a neural network.

Aim. To evaluate the possibility in principle of using an array of 8 sensors for recognizing different grips.

Materials and methods. Research was conducted on 23 healthy volunteers, whose surface myograms were recorded at 13 different grips. An array of surface-type electroneuromyographic sensors (n = 8) with bipolar electrodes and electroneuromyographic signal amplification factor of 2000 times, myograph and software are of own development were used as a technical base for the research.

Results. For most subjects, the differences in the investigated parameters when comparing grips with each other reached thousands of percent, especially when comparing the product of frequency and mean amplitude. In some pairs the differences were less significant and amounted to less than 400 %. The proportion of pairs with reliable differences varies from subject to subject when comparing the product of frequency and mean amplitude and ranges from 71 to 98 %. The average value for the whole group is 87 %. When comparing frequency only, the variation ranges from 67 to 93 %, with an average of 78 %.

Conclusion. For most subjects, the majority of grips are confidently differentiated from each other. Due to pronounced individual peculiarities, the decision to use this or that parameter to control the bioprosthesis for a definite person is individual and should be made after a thorough neurophysiological research. Some people will require training in order to develop a new motor stereotype.

About the authors

E. A. Eliseichev

Rybinsk State Aviation Technical University named after P.A. Solovyov

Author for correspondence.
Email: EvgenijEliseichev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6741-4465

Evgeniy Aleksandrovich Eliseichev

53 Pushkina St., Rybinsk 152934

Russian Federation

A. A. Tyaptin

“MIFRM” LLC (Medical Center “Motus”)

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-5411-2251

93 Tutayevskoye shosse, Yaroslavl 150033

Russian Federation

R. M. Zhilin

Rybinsk State Aviation Technical University named after P.A. Solovyov

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-7913-8368

53 Pushkina St., Rybinsk 152934

Russian Federation

P. S. Vorobyev

Rybinsk State Aviation Technical University named after P.A. Solovyov

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9518-4337

53 Pushkina St., Rybinsk 152934

Russian Federation

I. S. Blinov

Rybinsk State Aviation Technical University named after P.A. Solovyov

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2272-2277

53 Pushkina St., Rybinsk 152934

Russian Federation

References

  1. Plotnikov A.A. Control algorithm of a prosthetic human hand. Matritsa nauchnogo poznaniya = Matrix of Scientific Knowledge 2019;(6):87–4. (In Russ.).
  2. Bezyazychnyy V.F., Yeliseichev E.A., Vorobyev P.S. et al. Review of ways of reading EMG signals in the forearm area for controlling of bionic upper limb prostheses. Biomeditsinskaya radioelektronika = Biomedicine Radioengineering 2023;26(1):35–10. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18127/j15604136-202301-04
  3. Gorokhova N.M., Golovin M.S., Chezhin M.A. Methods for controlling upper limb prostheses. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy vestnik informatsionnykh tekhnologiy, mekhaniki i optiki = Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics 2019;19(2):314–2. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-2-314-325
  4. Budko R.Yu., Chernov N.N., Budko A.Yu. et al. Forecession electromyography recognition and gestures selection for protesis control. Modelirovanie, optimizatsiya i informatsionnye tekhnologii = Modelling, Optimization and Information Technology 2019;24(1):17, 18. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26102/2310-6018/2019.24.1.017
  5. Phinyomark A., Phukpattaranont P., Limsakul C. Investigating long-term effects of feature extraction methods for continuous EMG pattern classification. Fluctuation Noise Lett 2012;11(4):1250028. doi: 10.1142/S0219477512500289
  6. Branchukova D.A., Peregudova O.O., Killer A.I. et al. Neural network management of bionic prosthesis. Vestnik molodyozhnoy nauki Rossii = Bulletin of Youth Science of Russia 2020;(1):15. (In Russ.).
  7. Bhagwat S., Mukherji P. Electromyogram (EMG) based fingers movement recognition using sparse filtering of wavelet packet coefficients. Sādhanā 2020;45(3):11. doi: 10.1007/s12046-019-1231-9

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 85909 от  25.08.2023.