Role of еlectromyography in assessing prognosis for children with obstetric brachial plexus injury in practice of a specialized center

The aim of current publication – to present our own experience in use of electromyographic examination in prognosis for children with obstetric brachial plexus injury to practical neurologists and neurophysiologists. Review of literature shows that common approaches to electrotrophysiological diagnosis of obstetric brachial plexus injury do not exist. The aim of this study– to evaluate retrospectively electrophysiological and sonographic parameters of obstetric brachial plexus injury in children, determining the most informative variables. Since 2007 to 2014 we examined 218 children, 74 of them were operated. Electrophysiological investigation in young children have difficulties in performance.
We present our algorithm of diagnostic of obstetric brachial plexus injury: 1) testing main muscles, which perform basic movements
in upper limb (needle EMG of supra- and infraspinatus muscles and cutaneous EMG of biceps muscles); 2) localization of injury (paralysis or Duchenne – Erb palsy and electrophysiological criteria of spinal cord root avulsion). We found out that the most crucial role in assessing prognosis plays an examination of motor unit potentials (MUPs) duration. Absence of MUPs within needle EMG from supraspinatus muscle and absence of interference curve from biceps muscle during first 6 months have poor prognosis. After 6 months careful, dynamic study of MUPs duration in infraspinatus muscle and co-contraction of agonist and antagonist muscles is needed. To decide whether reconstructive surgery in a patient with obstetric brachial plexus injury is necessary, surgeon must analyze clinical and instrumental data. The possibility of usage of the ultrasonogrophy in brachial plexus injury requires further investigation.

1. Duchenne G.B.A. Del’ electrisationlocalise etdesonApplicationalapathologieetlatherapeuti que. JBBalliere 1872;357–62.

2. Adler J.B., Patterson Jr R.L. Erb’s palsy. Longterm results of treatment in eighty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1967;49(6):1052–64.

3. Bennet G.C., Harrold A.J. Prognosis and early management of birth injuries to the brachialplexus. BMJ 1976;1(6024): 1520 –1.

4. Boo N.Y., Lye M.S., Kanchanamala M., Ching C.L. Brachial plexus injuries in Malaysian neonates: incidence and associated risk factors. J Trop Pediatr 1991;37(6):327–30.

5. Bryant D.R., Leonardi M.R., Landwehr J.B., Bottoms S.F. Limited usefulness of fetal weight inpredicting neonatal brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179(3 Pt 1):686–9.

6. Eng G.D. Brachial plexus palsy in newborn infants. Pediatrics 1971;48(1):18–28.

7. Eng G.D., Koch B., Smokvina M.D. Brachial plexus palsy in neonates and children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1978;59(10): 458–64.

8. Gilbert W.M., Nesbitt T.S., Danielsen B. Associated factors in 1611 cases of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93(4):536–40.

9. Graham E.M., ForouzanI., Morgan M.A. A retrospective analysis of Erb’s palsy cases and theirrelation to birth weight and trauma at delivery. J Matern Fetal Med 1997;6(1):1–5.

10. Gordon M., Rich H., Deutschberger J., Green M. The immediate and long-term outcome of obstetric birth trauma. I. Brachial plexus paralysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;117(1):51–6.

11. Greenwald A.G., Schute P.C., Shiveley J.L. Brachial plexus birth palsy: a 10-year report on the incidence and prognosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1984;4(6):689–92.

12. Hardy A.E. Birth injuries of the brachial plexus: incidence and prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1981;63B(1):98–101.

13. Levine M.G., Holroyde J., Woods Jr J.R. et al. Birth trauma: incidence and predisposing factors. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63(6):792–5.

14. McFarland L.V., Raskin M., Daling J.R., Benedetti T.J. Erb/Duchenne’s palsy: a consequence offetalmacrosomia and method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68(6):784–8.

15. Nocon J.J., McKenzie D.K., Thomas L.J, Hansell R.S. Shoulder dystocia: an analysis of risks andobstetric maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168(6 Pt 1):1732–7.

16. Perlow J.H., Wigton T., Hart J. et al. Birth trauma: a five-yearreview of incidence and associated perinatal factors. J Reprod Med 1996;41(10):754–60.

17. Salonen I.S., Uusitalo R. Birth injuries: incidence and predisposing factors. Z Kinderchir1990;45(3):133–5.

18. SjobergI., Erichs K., Bjerre I. Cause and effect of obstetric (neonatal) brachial plexus palsy. Acta Paediatr Scand 1988;77(3):357–64.

19. Soni A.L., Mir N.A., Kishan J. et al. Brachial plexus injuries in babies bornin hospital: an appraisal of risk factors in a developing country. Ann Trop Paediatr 1985;5(2):69–71.

20. Specht E.E. Brachial plexus palsy in the newborn. Incidence and prognosis. Clin Orthop 1975;110:32–4.

21. Tan K.L. Brachial palsy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1973;80(1):60–2.

22. Ecker J.L., Greenberg J.A., Norwitz E.R. et al. Birth weight as a predictor ofbrachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89 (5 Pt 1):643–7.

23. Evans-Jones G., Kay S.P., Weindling A.M. et al. Congenitalbrachial palsy: incidence, causes, and outcome in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88(3):F185–9.

24. Donnelly V., Foran A., Murphy J. et al. Neonatal brachial plexuspalsy: an unpredictable injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(5):1209–12.

25. Gonen R., Bader D., Ajami M. Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases ofsuspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of Cesare and elivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183(5):1296–300.

26. Walle T., Hartikainen-Sorri A.L. Obstetric shoulder injury. Associated risk factors, prediction and prognosis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72(6):450–4.

27. Bager B. Perinatally acquired brachial plexus palsy – a persisting challenge. Acta Paediatr 1997;86(11):1214–9.

28. Gherman R.B. Increased cesarean delivery rate: no effect on brachial plexus palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179(5):1378–9.

29. Gilbert A., Khouri N., Carlioz H. Birth palsy of the brachial plexus – surgical exploration and attempted repair in twenty one cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1980;66(1) 33–42.

30. Metaizeau J.P., Gayet C., Plenat F. Les lesions obstericales du plexus brachial. Chir Pediat 1979;20:159–63.

31. Aszmann O.C., Winkler T., Korajk K. et al. The influense of GDNF on the timecourse and extent of motoneuron loss in the cervical spinal cord after brachial plexus injury in the neonate. Neurol Res 2004;26212–8.

32. Korak K., Tarn S.L., Gordon T. et al. Changes in spinal cord architecture after brachial plexus injury in the newborn. Brain 2004;127:1488–95.

33. Bufalini C., Pescatori G. Posterior cervical electroneuromyography in the diagnosis and prognosis of brachial plexus injuries. Bone Joint Sugg 1969;1B:627–31.

34. Leffert R.D. Clinical diagnosis, testing, and electromyographyc study in brachial plexus traction injuries. CORR 1988;237: 24–31.

35. Balakrishnan G., Kadadi B.K. Clinical examination versus routine and paraspinal electromyographic studies in predicting the site of lesion in brachial plexus injury. J Hand Surg Am 2004;29(1):140–3.

36. Новиков М.Л., Торно Т.Э. Травматические повреждения плечевого сплетения и современные способы хирургической коррекции. Часть II. Тактика лечения повреждений плечевого сплетения. Нервно-мышечные болезни 2013;1:18–25.

37. Ferrante M.A., Wilbourn A.J. Electrodiagnostic approach to the patient with suspected brachial plexopathy. Neurol Clin 2002;20:423–50.

38. Buchthal F., Rosenfalck P., Guld C. Action potential parametrs in different normal human muscles and their dependence on physical variables. Acta Physiol Scand1954;93:15–30.

39. Матвеева Н.Ю., Еськин Н.А., Приписнова С.Г. Возможности ультразвукового исследования в диагностике повреждений и заболеваний периферических нервов верхней конечности. Вестн травматол ортопед 2008;82–8.

40. Meyer R.D. Treatment of adult and obstetrical brachial plexus injuries. Orthopedics 1986;9(6): 899–903.

41. Metaizeau J.P., Prevot J., Lascombes P. Obstetrical paralysis. Spontaneous development and results of early microsurgical treatment]. Ann Pediatr (Paris) 1984;31(2):93–102.

42. Waters P.M. Comparison of the natural history, the outcome of microsurgical repair, and the outcome of operative reconstruction in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1999;81(5):649–59.

43. Новиков М.Л. Травматические повреждения плечевого сплетения: современные способы хирургической коррекции. Часть I. Диагностика повреждений плечевого сплетения. Нервно-мышечные болезни 2012;4:19–27.

44. Terzis J.K., Novikov M.L. Radiological and electrophysiological detection of nerve roots avulsionin patients with birth-related brachial plexus paralysis. Semin Plast Surg 2005;19(1):24–41.

45. Smith S.J. The role of neurophysiological investigation in traumatic brachial plexus lesions in adults and children. J Hand Surg (Br) 1996;21:145–7.

46. Seddon H.J. Three types of nerve injuries. Brain 1943;66:238–88.

47. Sunderland S. Nerves and nerve injuries, 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, London, 1978.