Preview

Neuromuscular Diseases

Advanced search

RESULTS OF AN OPEN-LABEL COMPARATIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF AXOGLATIRAN® FS (F-SINTEZ, RUSSIA) EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY IN COMPARISON WITH COPAXONE®-TEVA (TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., ISRAEL) IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-8721-2016-6-4-28-36

Abstract

Objective. Comparison of Axoglatiran® FS (F-Sintez,  Russia) and Copaxone®-Teva (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.,  Israel) efficiency and safety in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Materials and methods. In the study 150 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were randomized into 2 groups: patients in the 1st group (n = 100) received treatment with Axoglatiran® FS, patients in the 2nd group (n = 50) received treatment with Copaxone®-Teva. Vital signs of every patient in the study were monitored accompanied by physical examinations, neurological examinations with EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) and MSFC (Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite) evaluations, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and lab tests. Results. Mean age (M ± SD) of the patients in the 1st group was 32.8 ± 8.7 years (20–54  years), percentages of men and women were 34 and 66 % respectively, mean age of multiple sclerosis onset was 27.93 ± 7.72 years (11–48 years). Median (Me), lower and upper quartiles estimates [LQ; UQ] on the EDSS scale were 2 [1.5; 3.0] steps (1.0–4.5  steps). In the 2nd group mean age of the patients was 35.2 ± 9.5 years (18–57  years), percentages of men and women were 24 and 76 % respectively, mean age of multiple sclerosis onset was 26.5 ± 6.9 years (18–47  years), EDSS estimates were 2.25 [1.5; 3.5] steps (1–5  steps). In the 1st group 88 (88 %) patients completed the study, in the 2nd  group 44 (88 %) patients completed the study. Among them in 73 (82.95 %) patients in the 1st group and 34 (77.27 %) patients in the 2nd  group the disease didn’t exacerbate (p > 0.05). In both groups no progression according to the EDSS and MSFC scale was observed (p > 0.05). Magnetic resonance imaging data showed that dynamics of the total number of T2 lesions, contrast-enhancing T1 lesions, atrophy degree estimated using internuclear index were comparable in both groups (p > 0.05). Safety profiles of Axoglatiran® FS and Copaxone®Teva were evaluated as satisfactory in both groups: local reactions were the most common adverse event (57.7 and 63.0 % in the 1st  and 2nd groups respectively).

Conclusion. Efficiency, safety and tolerability of Axoglatiran® FS is comparable with the reference medicine Copaxone®-Teva in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. This result allows to recommend the use of Axoglatiran® FS in clinical practice.

About the Authors

F. A. Khabirov
Kazan State Medical Academy; Republican Clinical Diagnostic Center for demyelinating diseases
Russian Federation

11 Mushtari St., Kazan 420012; 13 Vatutina St., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420021



T. I. Khaibullin
Kazan State Medical Academy; Republican Clinical Diagnostic Center for demyelinating diseases
Russian Federation

11 Mushtari St., Kazan 420012; 13 Vatutina St., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420021



E. V. Granatov
Republican Clinical Diagnostic Center for demyelinating diseases
Russian Federation

13 Vatutina St., Kazan,  Republic of Tatarstan, 420021



N. N. Babicheva
Republican Clinical Diagnostic Center for demyelinating diseases
Russian Federation

13 Vatutina St., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420021



L. A. Aver’yanova
Republican Clinical Diagnostic Center for demyelinating diseases
Russian Federation

13 Vatutina St., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420021



S. R. Shakirzyanova
Republican Clinical Diagnostic Center for demyelinating diseases
Russian Federation
13 Vatutina St., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, 420021


References

1. Дун О.А., Шакирова Д.Х., Хабиров Ф.А. и др. Математическое моделирование потребности в препаратах, изменяющих течение рассеянного склероза. Фармация 2012;(2):34–7. [Dun O.A., Shakirova D.Kh., Khabirov F.A. et al. Mathematical modeling of the need in medicines capable of changing the course of multiple sclerosis. Farmatsiya = Farmacy 2012;(2):34–7. (In Russ.)].

2. Рассеянный склероз. Клиническое руководство. Под ред. Е.И. Гусева, И.А. Завалишина, А.Н. Бойко. М.: Реал Тайм, 2011. 528 с. [Multiple sclerosis. Clinical guidelines. Eds. by: E.I. Gusev, I.A. Zavalishin, A.N. Boyko. Moscow: Real Time, 2011. 528 p. (In Russ.)].

3. Teitelbaum D., Meshorer A., Hirshfeld T. et al. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by a synthetic polypeptide. Eur J Immunol 1971;1(4):242–8. DOI: 10.1002/eji.1830010406. PMID: 5157960.

4. Boster A., Bartoszek M.P., O’Connell C. et al. Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing – remitting multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2011;4(5):319–32. DOI: 10.1177/1756285611422108. PMID: 22010043. PMCID: PMC3187678.

5. Johnson K.P., Brooks B.R., Cohen J.A. et al. Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 1995;45(7):1268–76. PMID: 7617181.

6. Filippi M., Rovaris M., Rocca M.A. et al. Glatiramer acetate reduces the proportion of new MS lesions evolving into “black holes”. Neurology 2001;57(4):731–3. PMID: 11524494.

7. Fisher E., Rudick R.A., Cutter G. et al. Relationship between brain atrophy and disability: an 8-year follow-up study of multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2000;6(6):373–7. PMID: 11212131.

8. Ford C.C., Johnson K.P., Lisak R.P. et al. A prospective open-label study of glatiramer acetate: over a decade of continuous use in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2006;12(3):309–20. PMID: 16764344.

9. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (2010) press release: Teva announces Copaxone® reaches one million patient years of experience in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Ed. by K. Mannix. Available at: http://www.tevapharm.com/pr/2010/pr_922.asp. [Ref list].

10. Каирбекова Е.И., Тотолян Н.А., Макшаков Г.С. и др. Связь атрофии головного мозга и когнитивных нарушений у пациентов с рассеянным склерозом. Практическая медицина 2014;2(78):45–7. [Kairbekova E.I., Totolyan N.A., Makshakov G.S. et al. Relationship between brain atrophy and cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Prakticheskaya meditsina = Practical Medicine 2014;2(78):45–7. (In Russ.)].


Review

For citations:


Khabirov F.A., Khaibullin T.I., Granatov E.V., Babicheva N.N., Aver’yanova L.A., Shakirzyanova S.R. RESULTS OF AN OPEN-LABEL COMPARATIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF AXOGLATIRAN® FS (F-SINTEZ, RUSSIA) EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY IN COMPARISON WITH COPAXONE®-TEVA (TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., ISRAEL) IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. Neuromuscular Diseases. 2016;6(4):28-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2222-8721-2016-6-4-28-36

Views: 1586


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2222-8721 (Print)
ISSN 2413-0443 (Online)