Conduction studies of phrenic nerve in healthy children

Background. Unlike parameters of phrenic nerve conduction in healthy adults characterized by stability, in children variations with age are observed. The objective is to investigate the M-wave latency and amplitude in electroneurographic (ENG) examination of the phrenic nerve in healthy children of different ages for development of a normative database of neurophysiological data.

Materials and methods. 48 healthy children (28 girls and 20 boys) were examined. Mean age was 9.19 ± 5.43 years (1–18 years). ENG examination of the phrenic nerve was performed with the modified standard procedure of stimulation at the level of the outer margin of the lower third of the sternocleidomastoid muscle with registration of M-wave from standard diaphragm point and parallel registration of the muscle activity from m.deltoideus and m.serratus anterior.

Results. Mean values of the M-response latency were 5.64 ± 1.25 ms, amplitude – 0.66 ± 0.34 mV. For age-differentiated subgroups 1–2 years (n = 7), 3–5 years (n = 9), 6–12 years (n = 15), and 13–18 years (n = 17), the latency was 4.96 ± 1.94; 5.01 ± 1.13; 5.42 ± 0.84, and 6.44 ± 1.43 ms, respectively; the amplitude was 1.01 ± 0.37; 0.87 ± 0.31; 0.61 ± 0.24, and 0.45 ± 0.21 mV, respectively. The M-response amplitude values in children aged 1–2 years significantly differed from the values in children aged 6–12 and 13–18 years.

Conclusion. ENG examination of the phrenic nerve is a technically uncomplicated procedure, and the obtained data is easy to interpret. During phrenic nerve ENG in children, it is necessary to take age variability of the M-wave latency and amplitude into account. The M-wave amplitude in healthy toddlers (1–2 years old) was significantly lower than in children aged 6–18 years.

1. Perotto A.O., Delagi E.F., Iazzetti J., Daniel M. Аnatomical guide for the electromyographer: the limbs and trunk. 5th edn. Thomas C.C. Publisher, LTD., 2011. 378 p.

2. Podnar S. Idiopathic phrenic neuropathies: a case serias and review of the literature. Muscle Nerve 2015;52(6):986–92. DOI: 10.1002/mus.24673. PMID: 25846409.

3. Gaber T.A.-Z.K. Case studies in neurological rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, 2008. 193 p.

4. Jenkins J.A., Sakamuri S., Katz J.S. et al. Phrenic nerve conduction studies as a biomarker of respiratory insufficiency in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2016;17(3–4):213–20. DOI: 10.3109/21678421.2015.1112406. PMID: 26618854.

5. Smith B.K., Corti M., Martin A.D. et al. Altered activation of the diaphragm in late-onset Pompe disease. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2016;222:11–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2015.11.013. PMID: 26612101.

6. Heinbecker P., Bishop G.H., O’Leary J.L. Functional and histologic studies of somatic and autonomic nerves of man. Arch Neur Psych 1936;35(6):1233–55. DOI: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1936.02260060075007.

7. Sarnoff S.J., Hardenbergh E., Whittenberger J.L. Electrophrenic respiration. Am J Physiol 1948;155(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1948.155.1.1. PMID: 18102659.

8. Davis J.N. Phrenic nerve conduction in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1967;30(5):420–6. DOI: 10.1136/ jnnp.30.5.420. PMID: 4294147.

9. Moosa A. Phrenic nerve conduction in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1981;23(4):434–48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1981. tb02016.x. PMID: 7274591.

10. MacLean I.C., Mattioni T.A. Phrenic nerve conduction studies: a new technique and its application in quadriplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981;25:229–36. PMID: 6972202.

11. Carvalho M., Alves M., Sales-Luís M.L. Neurophysiologic study of the phrenic nerve. Acta Med Port 1991;4(6):297–300. PMID: 1807093.

12. Zifko U., Chen R., Remtulla H. et al. Respiratory electrophysiological studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60(2):191–4. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.60.2.191. PMID: 8708652.

13. Similowski T., Mehiri S., Duguet A. et al. Comparison of magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation in assessment of phrenic nerve conduction time. J Appl Physiol 1997;82(4):1190–9. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.4.1190. PMID: 9104856.

14. Lee H.J., DeLisa J. Manual of nerve conduction study and surface anatomy for needle electromyography. 4th edn. Philadelphia, 2004. 301 p.

15. Preston D.C., Shapiro B.E. Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders. 3rd edn.. Saunders, Philadelfia, 2013. 664 p.

16. Martinez de Posadas M.C., Liste H., Cottini C. Aranafe N. Combined phrenic nerve conduction and diaphragmatic ultrasound, in children’s neuro muscular diseases. J Neurol Sci 1997;150(1):S95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(97)85305-1.

17. Imai T., Shizukawa H., Imaizumi H. et al. Phrenic nerve conduction in infancy and early childhood. Muscle Nerve 2000;23(6):915–8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(200006)23:6<915::AIDMUS11>3.0.CO;2-T. PMID: 10842268.

18. Russell R.I., Helps B.A., Helms P.J. Normal values for phrenic nerve latency in children. Muscle Nerve 2001;24(11):1548–50. DOI: 10.1002/mus.1181. PMID: 11745959.

19. Aminoff M.J. Aminoff’s electrodiagnosis in clinical neurology. 6th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2012.

20. Voitenkov V.B., Komantsev V.N., Skripchenko N.V. et al. Age-related changes of peripheral nerve system and muscles of the limbs in healthy persons. Uspekhi gerontologii = Advances in Gerontology 2017;130(1):78–83. (In Russ.)